Has anyone else loaded 2.2 and ran quadrant? my score was 1291 just under the N1 with 2.2.I'm wondering how when this 2.2 first showed up before the EVO was out, they got a higher score?
View 3 Replies
I got the app. I see when I was at 2.1 I got in the 500's but now with 2.2 I am getting 1,242, better than the droid x.
BUT WHAT DOES IT MEAN?!
It is seriously like a double rainbow to me. (in all joking aside, I really am wondering what this means)
1st - what does this mean or showing me?
2nd, I am scoring 1290...which is below the Nexus One. What do I need to do to better this if what i'm getting is too low?
I just isntalled and ran the quadrant benchmart app and have some questions.
while running the 2D and 3D graphics tests I got the followign results:
2D 1/1 consistantly around 17 FPS
3D 1/3 ran around 7 for awhile, then around 12, jumped to 25, then ran around 8 FPS for awhile
3D 2/3 ran consistantly around 40 FPS
3D 3/3 ran consistantly around 10 FPS
my overall score was 1391
my question is, what does all this mean? is it any good? 1391 out of what? are those frams per second results decent? is there a reason the first 3D FPS results were so inconsistant?
also with linpack, I'm getting 38 mflops in .14 seconds. why so crappy?
I'm running CyanogenMod6 test8 with the stock kernel. I did it with SetCPU at 998MHz and I uninstalled SetCPU and reran linpack and same results.
I just got a new HTC Evo with Froyo and downloaded the Quadrant Standard benchmarking app. I ran it around 5 times and averaged around 790, I don't understand why this is so low given that usually EVOs are up around 1200. I ran advanced task killer beforehand so there were no apps running either. Does anyone know what could be going on?
View 4 Replies View RelatedI have seen several quadrant scores of the Evo with froyo and they are all in the mid 1200's. Thats very close to what most stock 2.1 X's are running. And keep in mind that a stock 2.1 evo is like 750 quadrant.
View 49 Replies View RelatedI would like to get some some real world data. Against my phone.Could you guys post your Quadrant scores please. In the Droid forums we're getting from 1450-1680. I was just wondering how your scores compare against the chart. I'm assuming it would be better than the Nexus One 2.2 on there.
View 1 Replies View RelatedRunning the stock rom on my Evo I got 544 as a result on Quadrant. Is this normal for the Evo stock 2.1 Rom? If not what can be wrong?
View 3 Replies View Relatedcan someone explain the quadrant score to me and if it really means anything? last weekend when i first rooted my DX seemed super fast. had a score of 1580+. then i bricked it and now with almost the exact same set up the most i get is 1403. i dont know if maybe i need to clear out some memory or is there another way to improve it. im running 2.3.15. then i had 2.3.13 but i thought the newer one would be an improvement. idk now.
View 14 Replies View Relatedhow do I boost my quadrant scores WITHOUT ROOTING. Because my note 2 rarely scores 7000.
View 2 Replies View RelatedMy wife's stock, unrooted, Droid routinely scored in the 300s, right where a stock Droid should be. Now with 2.2, she hit 843, and 916--all without starting fresh from a reboot. Looks like some of the "smokin!" is true after all!
View 2 Replies View RelatedI may be mistaken, but Froyo was available to Captivate users in the leaked JI6 firmware, yes? Well I'm wondering what your Quadrant scores are, running Froyo JI6, on an otherwise stock Captivate, meaning no lagfix.So here is why I'm asking, I read somewhere, can't remember the link, that Froyo is having some issues with the Hummingbird. Basically it offers no speed-boost at all to the Captivate.Froyo was expected to dramatically improve CPU scored on Quadrant.This video also has me worried, this guy in the video ran quadrant and got a score of 975...I already get 925 on my vibrant stock, running 2.1. Froyo is suppose to give us scores like 1800 without lagfix, NOT 975!
View 49 Replies View Relatedthe Dinc is still alot faster overall and I'm still getting lag with the SF, especially if a Samsung widget (ex: buddies) is on the screen.Which of these is a better score of raw performance (ie: little lag).I'm going to read though the same question posted on the Eris forums now. quadrant vs. linpack - Android Forums
View 5 Replies View RelatedJust curious on what everyones scores are. I don't want to turn the scores into a pissing contest but having flashed roms since July, the froyo/2.2 roms always have higher scores. Also, just fyi, I really only use the scores just to confirm what I already know when a rom becomes laggy. I run the benchmarks for that reason
View 20 Replies View Relatedwhat do i need to do to improve my scores. getting constant 32 on the flop and 1192 to 1221 on quad.
View 7 Replies View Related"With the same process as before, my Galaxy S is now in 2.attempt with latest firmware I9000XWJG5 + ext4 fix even faster than before. (first attempt was with stock firmware and v2 kernel)These are quadrant benchmark scores in comparison between I9000XWJG5(pure) on the left side and I9000XWJG5(+ext4 fix) on the right.I use Sandisk microSD 16 GB Class 2, formatted in 13.8GB(FAT32) and 1 GB(ext4) partition using Paragon Hard Disk Manager 2010
View 1 Replies View RelatedIf I don't use ATK, my phone runs very fast and smooth with a ton of crap listed in the back ground. It even scrolls fine. However, it benchmarks lower than when I use ATK to kill everything. My quadrant scores really get low when ATK shows a ton of programs. Kill them and the phone is slow, but benches higher. I stopped using ATK for the most part, but occassionally do for what ever reasons. High bench marks makes me feel good, but so does a smooth phone!
View 5 Replies View RelatedI see everyone always posting their quadrant score. Is it an app I need to download? I'd like to monitor the speed of my phone before and after I root, so I figured this would be handy.
View 2 Replies View RelatedCan someone please explain the difference between quadrant and linpack scores? I get better quad scores with a lower clock speed and better linpack scores with a higher clock speed. which one should I be more interested in? on kaos v32 btw.
View 2 Replies View RelatedOK, I got a BOGO for the Fascinate with my Wife. I'm currently using the Fascinate now and I'm not overly impressed.
I posted the original question on the Fascinate board, but I'd like more exposure to the Incredible members.
I like the looks and size of the Fascinate, but I'm not liking the slug feeling. Sill on the fence for the Samsung OS style. Some is good, some is in alot of need. It's behind HTC Sense for sure though.
Quadrant vs. Linpack scores
I couldn't find a thread that specifically had this information so:
Post your Android 2.2 benchmarks here and mention and non stock mods.
So, just curious for those who have installed this leak, what kind of scores are you seeing? After all my stuff was restored (i did a clean and wipe), I am ending up with a linpack of 34 (i think i am seeing more people closer to 38) and quadrant at 1156 (and i see people up at 1400+)...
What is everyone else getting? And keep the spam out of this one.
Viper Rom 2.6 with lagfix
View 6 Replies View RelatedPlease download Linpak for Android and Quadrant Standard from the market and let us know what both of your scores were.Sorry about the title I posted in the wrong forum. I would still like to know for the Captivate though.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI installed the leaked 2.2 update and got it all working. Not being happy enough with how it came out I started playing around with my Titanium Backups and system settings. (I was trying to restore system settings so I wouldn't have to go through everything again.) In any case, I took benchmarks while doing this, because I didn't want to gimp my now much faster dinc.
On a stock 2.1 my Quadrant score was around 530. With the 2.2 leak my Quadrant score was around 1050. After restoring some 2.1 system files my Quadrant score was 1213. Of course, my phone became a bit unstable. Somebody with more free time needs to sit down and play around with this. A few tweaks and the Dinc could really fly on 2.2.
what are you guys getting on a non rooted phone mine was 330 i think it is low
View 8 Replies View RelatedI've been running BB V0.4 with chevy's no1 ULV 1.2Ghz kernel (mostly as an experiment). All my normal applications run flawlessly and the battery life has been good. No issues streaming video, running Pandora, playing 3D games, running SetCPU stress test. However, about every 4th time I run Quadrant, it force closes on the program startup.
This looks like a warning sign that I'm running right on the edge and will eventually have trouble with my normal applications as well. I haven't run Quadrant before using this new kernel. Is this a program that will sometimes force close even nothing is wrong? Also it only force closes if I haven't run it in a while. Once it is in memory I can rerun it many times with no force closes.
Has anyone else tried 4G after the update.I just tried it when I was in a 4G area and my speeds were terrible. It was only about 600-700K. When I tried 3G I was about 1300K.
View 9 Replies View RelatedI'm currently testing weather I want to drop my aircard for the EVO, but I'm noticing the speeds and ping times are lower on the EVO.Same network, same time, same location , same speed test (speedtest.net), different devices.Is there some throttling going on? I've cracked 1mb only twice on the evo while the aircard has done it nearly every time i've checked in the last two years.pingtimes are horrible in the 300's while my aircard is at 117 or so usually. This is a killer for my ps3 gaming. Or could this just be the fact on the evo app we can't pic the servers and maybe its using a bad one or its far away.Hopefully this issue will be resolved before my 30 days are up. More money for slower speeds? I like new stuff but carrying around a phone isn't worth losing netflix and ps3 gaming.
View 17 Replies View Relatedfirst time i killed EVERY task & ran it.. i got an 879 (imo seems WAY too low) i mean the last benchmark i ran was on my D2 which was defective but i was still like double 1400 (i know that had 2.2 & this doesnt) but its a Galaxy S shouldnt it at least be 1000 area? post your benchmarks please
EDIT : i ran it one more time after that & got an 877 .. both times btw it said i had an internal error AFTER i saw the score..