I have a singleton in an activity. When I end my application (like pressing back button), and start it again after some time, the singleton is not recreated, but is holding previous state. Singleton is not destroyed if the application is destroyed? Do I have to null its static members in onDestroy() to avoid memory leak.
View 1 Replies
Does it have all the lag people have complained about? I've played with one in a store and didn't notice any lag. It's not quite as smooth as iOS, but that doesn't mean much. However, you guys have had it for about a month now. Does it slow down the more apps you use? (Note: I'm not app crazy. I'm much more interested in a phone's core functionality than apps).
What is all this talk between you guys of "Did you get 003?" and the like?
Is the screen separation issue really an issue or a tempest in a teapot? I'm a tech blog reader so I know that these things are generally a big deal to a few and most devices have no issues.
How fast is the camera when taking shots? Instantly ready to go one after the other or a bit of a delay?
Is the battery really as bad as they say? I understand that 4G eats a lot, and if you have a billion things going at once that'll hurt, but on the flip side I don't want to have to have everything off to the point that I'm using a flat screen RAZR.
Is it just me or is this thing not living up to all the hype? I know there are tons of tmo fanyboys that will swear this is the greatest phone ever, and i wanted to be one of them, but sadly i cannot. I have dealt with major lag on this phone the past 3 days wether it be opening apps or just trying to make a call. The lightness of the phone doesnt really bother me though i do prefer the feel of the nexus a lot more. I dont know, i guess i was just expecting so much from this phone and to be honest im starting to feel like i will return it and stick with my N1 till this holiday season. Another thing is 3g reception, wow. Yesterday i was outside at union park in chicago, i was dropping down to G, no not edge, G constantly. Coudnt send sms, mms, nothing. Was very aggrevating. I really really want to love this phone, im just having a hard time. I guess i was spoiled with the N1 for so long.
View 19 Replies View RelatedI have an activity (say activity A) which displays video using a mediaplayer, rendered in a surfaceview.
The use case is to pause the video, start another activity (say activity B), then come back to activity A.
Activity A is stopped but not destroyed when going to B, which is good.
The surface view (since not visibile) IS destroyed (as observed from the notification callbacks). When coming back to activity A, and restarting the mediaplayer using start(), the media player does play back the audio, but video is not seen. Errors like this one are output on Logcat:
CODE;......
Unfortunately, using the new instance of SurfaceHolder as provided by surfaceCreated() doesn't help (i.e. provides the same error).
I have read in various posts a solution would be to reset the mediaplayer and restart it completely, however it is not efficient, as the end user would have to wait for the whole player preparation cycle + seekTo last position within the stream.
As shown with the fact the audio plays back, it should be a matter of plumbing between the the video decoder and the new surfaceholder/view.
What should be the best solution (best = fastest) to resume video playback when resuming the activity?
I have a flow A->B->C->D where A desires some information that is obtained by D. B, C, and D propagate the data back through the flow using setResult(RESULT_OK, data) and finish(). All intents in A, B, and C are started with startActivityForResult. However, if B is reclaimed by Android and forced to call onCreate again after C finishes onActivityResult in B is never called and the data never makes it back to A. Is there a way I can be sure that onActivityResult will be called?
View 5 Replies View RelatedI have an app that uses a database. At startup I check to see if my tables are missing and if so I create them. Works great.
I've noticed that if I "adb uninstall" then the next time I run my app the tables are created again (this is what I need), but what about when updating through the marketplace?
I'm in the process of releasing an update, and I've made major changes to the tables. I'd like it if the tables were completely wiped and re-created, in fact my app needs this to happen. If someone updates and has the old tables then there will be a force close. Does anyone know the specifics of this scenario?
My tables are only for lookup, I store no user data so I dont really care about losing data on the updates.
Of course I know an option is to use some type of "version" table and check to see if I need to manually drop and create, but I was wondering if that was even needed.
In my TabActivity the user may be asked to switch to browser activity for OAuth phase, and if the phase takes too much time, my activity will be killed. After the user switches back to my activity, its onCreate() method is invoked again and tabs are recreated.
So I would like to know if there is any simple way to switch back to previous tab, and keep the tab as what it was. For example, one of the tab views contains a ViewSwitcher child, and I want to switch back to the switched view after recreating the activity.
Android has such concept as a Service. It makes sense for interprocess communication. But if I need this service from Activities running in the same process regular singleton seems to be more convenient. No need to register, to bind. Are there any benefits to use service in the same process?
View 17 Replies View RelatedI'm quite new to Android development. When is it a good idea to create an Android Service instead of just using a simple Singleton class?
Take, for example, the data layer downloading information feeds from the internet. Using a Service seems too much for some cases but sometimes I might need access to a Context so I'm a little unsure about how to design the app.
I often run into the following dilemma: I need some singleton-like object in my app (typically some central manager-like thing) and this object needs a context for various things. This means that I either have to pass a context to all methods needing one or have some sort of init-pattern to the object. Neither is pretty I think. What is the correct way of doing this? Or is this simply (even the definition of) a Service?
View 15 Replies View RelatedI'm considering creating a singleton wrapper for a Context so my model objects, if necessary, can open and read from a database connection. My model objects do not have access to a Context, and I'd like to avoid needing to pass a reference to a Context from object to object.I was planning to place into this singleton a reference to the Context returned by Application.getApplicationContext(). This singleton object would be initialized in my custom Application instance before anything else would need to or have a chance to use it.Can anyone think of a reason to not do this?
View 3 Replies View RelatedI'd like to know if it's possible to create a Singleton Service throughout an application ? Let's say I'd like to cerate a Service to play some mp3... I'd like it to be a Singleton, we don't want two mp3 tracks playing through each other (well maybe some would want that, but in my case I'm not making a DJ app) :P Also this Service should be somewhat dynamic as in there should be some interface so that I can stop, pauze and play the mp3 file/ stream. Now I have a couple of questions : - is this feasible ? - should I be using a Service or something else ? - how can an interface be set up in between an application and a service so that I can start, stop, pauze stuff ? - can there be something like a Singleton Service?
View 9 Replies View RelatedI have a singleton class and I am using it to access databases. I would like to know how it would behave if I use the same from my remote service class which runs as a separate process. Will it create a new instance in that process or will it use the instance from the other process?
View 3 Replies View RelatedI'm adapting Image Downloader from Google Android blog. I want ImageDownloader to be singleton since I'll be using it in multiple places in my application. I want also to be able to manipulate Bitmaps using different Strategies (eg. produce transparent bitmaps).I want to be able to use ImageDownloader in one activity and set transparent bitmaps, and in another use the same ImageDownloader but get black&white bitmaps using different strategy object.
View 5 Replies View RelatedIs the AudioTrack fundamentally designed to be a singleton? Methods on the OnPlaybackPositionUpdateListener receive just one argument, which is the AudioTrack itself. And since the AudioTrack does not have getTag/setTag methods I don't see any way to distinguish among multiple AudioTracks in the OnPlaybackPositionUpdateListener methods short of keeping track of references. So, if it's so why it's not implemented as a singleton? Any thoughts. I am trying to implement concurrent use of the AudioTrack. Anybody has any experience with this approach? Am I wasting time?
View 3 Replies View RelatedOn Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 1:19 PM, siva <sivaraj.r...@gmail.com> wrote: > I have a singleton in an activity. When I end my application (like > pressing back button), and start it again after some time, the > singleton is not recreated, but is holding previous state. Singleton > is not destroyed if the application is destroyed?
View 4 Replies View RelatedIn order to communicate with the server I need a huge global object (class with some hashmaps). all my activities (about 10) need that huge global object. which options do I have? I am thinking about passing the object using intends and about the possibility to make the object a singleton. using the db will be much too slow.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI have a singleton which stores some prudent information about the user of my application. At the moment, it stores the user's login and the user's location.The location is found via a Service. At the moment, the Service references my singleton directly to stuff the longitude and latitude into it. I would like to use a Broadcast Receiver to send a broadcast that the singleton hears and uses to update the values, instead. However, to register the Broadcast Receiver, I need a Context in my singleton. What is the slickest way to achieve what I'm wanting. Is Broadcast Receiver possibly not the appropriate object? Also, what problems am I looking at with using a singleton? I assume that Android will possibly reclaim this memory at any given time (which would obviously be bad); so how can I prevent that? Would passing in the application's Context and storing it in a member variable thwart this? The Android documentation states: "But, the life cycle of a static is not well under your control; so to abide by the life-cycle model, the application class should initiate and tear down these static objects in the onCreate() and on Terminate() methods of the Application Class," but I'm not entirely sure how to accomplish this.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have two services, both of them lies in separate apk, which run in same process. The two service share same jar file by <uses-library> method. The jar file implement a class, say "test", is a singleton. But I found that two instance of test is created under this case, could anybody give me some tips? I want to ensure it's singleton. Code...
View 8 Replies View RelatedLet me give you the scenario.
Say that my first Activity that loads up, also creates a thread, which will run indefinitely in the background.
Now, if I move to another Activity, I assume that the thread that I initially created in the main activity will continue to run.
So, now to my main question - in order to manage this background thread from other Activities, is it safe to store a reference to that thread in a singleton object?
I have a notification that starts my activity and passes a messages using the intent's putExtra() function. The message is then displayed to the user in the activity's onCreate function. When the application is restarted due to a orientation change, the message is shown again as it is still in the intent's bundled data.
How can I remove the extra data?
I tried the following:
Bundle bundle = getIntent().getExtras();
if (bundle.getBoolean("showMessage")) {
// ... show message that is in bundle.getString("message")
// remove message
bundle.remove("showMessage");
}
But the message will still be shown after the orientation changed, seems like the intent used is not the one I changed, but the original one. The only workaround I found is to save the showMessage additionally in onSaveInstanceState(). Is there another way? Or is this the way to go?
Can I pass a singleton class's object from one activity to another activity using intent? I am using singleton class as image class img = image class.get Instance();, so i need the img instance for another activity, how can i pass an object instance in Android.
View 2 Replies View RelatedIt would be nice if StackOverflow had a section where we could post tutorials like mine so that I can answer literally hundreds of questions that have been asked here with a single blow. See... every day I read questions about how to pass complex objects between activities, how to save state so that your app can resume after orientation change, how to update listviews when the data changes, etc, etc. Here is the second part of a tutorial series I posted on my blog... I hope that you actually read it... because I haven't seen any examples like it anywhere... and it has changed how I think about developing for Android across the board. The question is... is there a downside or negative affect of developing like this?
Beyond Smart Lists - How Observable Singletons change the game. Please read through both of these tutorials carefully... I will answer any questions about it here that I can... I really want to know what you think about this and if it might solve issues for you. NOTE TO MODERATORS: there are no advertisements of any kind on my blog.. so don't just close this because you think I am spamming somehow... I am not going to duplicate my post here.
If an Activity is a singleton in practice, I think I can gain some efficiency by declaring appropriate members "static", with zero risk. Yes?
View 4 Replies View Relatedtoday i meet the problem.i need technic can control the android machine from server.then i want send data from server to android with no request from android.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI'm trying to open a dialog window, but every time I try to open it it throws this exception:
CODE:.................
I'm creating it by calling showDialog with the display's id. The onCreateDialog handler logs fine and I can step through it without an issue, but I've attached it since it seems like I'm missing something:
CODE:............
Is there something missing from this? Some questions have talked about having this problem when creating a dialog from onCreate, which happen because the activity isn't created yet, but this is coming from a call from a menu object, and the appContext variable seems like it is correctly populated in the debugger.
I'm writing an application which connects to a back office site. The backoffice site contains a whole slew of JavaScript functions, at least 100 times the average site. Unfortunately it does not load them, and causes much of the functionality to not work properly. So I am running a test. I put a page out on my server which loads the FireBugLite javascript text. Its a lot of javascript and perfect to test and see if the Android WebView will load it. The WebView loads nothing, but the browser loads the Firebug Icon. What on earth would make the difference, why can it run in the browser and not in my WebView? Any suggestions.
More background information, in order to get the stinking backoffice application available on a Droid (or any other platform except windows) I needed to trick the bakcoffice application to believe what's accessing the website is Internet Explorer. I do this by modifying the WebView User Agent.Also for this application I've slimmed my landing page, so I could give you the source to offer me aid. package ksc.myKMB;
import android.app.Activity;
import android.app.AlertDialog;
import android.app.Dialog;
import android.app.ProgressDialog;
import android.content.DialogInterface;
import android.graphics.Bitmap;
import android.os.Bundle;
import android.view.Menu;
import android.view.MenuInflater;
import android.view.MenuItem;
import android.view.Window;
import android.webkit.WebChromeClient;
import android.webkit.WebView;
import android.webkit.WebSettings;
import android.webkit.WebViewClient;
import android.widget.Toast;
public class myKMB extends Activity {
I already have JavaScript on the web browser on, the problem is the web view is acting to different from the web browser.
I want to implement my own Tokenizer base on the file
"MultiAutoCompleteTextView.java",
but I encounter an error "com.android.internal.R cannot be resolved" when I try to
import "MultiAutoCompleteTextView.java" to my project.
code:.................
I haven't research any solutions to resolve this problem.How to correct "com.android.internal.R.attr.autoCompleteTextViewStyle" my own attr?
1- Does Android Browser (Éclair code base) support the "plug-in" or not?
2- Why "Google Gears" support is removed from the clair code base?
I searched the forum and came to know that earlier version of the Android does not support it at all? Here is the link for that, but this query asked in Dec'2008.
At first,I have a database created by using Ruby on rails.I just already implement insert function(HTTPPost) in my Android Application and it's work.But I don't know how to retrieve specific record from my databases and insert it back to specific record in Android (Like edit function in RoR)This is my insert code :
private void insertComment() {DefaultHttpClient client = new DefaultHttpClient();HttpPost post = new HttpPost("http://10.10.3.87:3000/comments");
// Configure the form parameters
List<NameValuePair> nvps = new ArrayList<NameValuePair>();
nvps.add(new BasicNameValuePair("comment[content]", t_comment.getText().toString();
nvps.add(new BasicNameValuePair("comment[id_account]", "1"));
nvps.add(new BasicNameValuePair("comment[id_place]", Integer.toString(position)I really try many ways out but it doesn't work and it takes very long time to fight with this piece of code. Actually, I really don't know how to specify RowID to HTTPPost.